|
Post by Annie45 on Sept 21, 2003 11:18:21 GMT -5
Wow I was just reading about how bad Bush's ratings are. They keep going down.
The democrats are really blasting him over the IRAQ war. Kennedy says the war was made up in Texas and there was no reason for the war.
Hmmm.
|
|
|
Post by John on Sept 25, 2003 13:28:06 GMT -5
Hi Ann, His ratings have plummeted since Clark is a contender. Also how could the ratings go anywhere but down when you consider: The war was a waste. The economy stinks. Unemployment is at an alltime high.
JohnO
|
|
|
Post by Harold on Dec 16, 2003 8:56:17 GMT -5
Mabe you should take a second lookTEXT John O.
|
|
|
Post by Harold on Dec 16, 2003 8:59:04 GMT -5
Maybe you should take a look at the polls today.
|
|
|
Post by JohnOn on Dec 16, 2003 12:49:15 GMT -5
Today it is up but it will be short lived. Just like what happened with stocks. They went way up and then crashed the next day (after Saddam was captured).
The economy stinks. There are so many people without jobs in the US. This is the basic reason the rating will never stay up.
|
|
|
Post by MichaelUK2 on Jan 2, 2004 10:36:33 GMT -5
What is the latest rating? I would say it must be getting better but I dont know if it is good enough to get re-elected.
|
|
|
Post by Republican on Jan 7, 2004 7:54:12 GMT -5
Bush is great! He is solving all the terrorism problems and all the economy problems. Democrats don't stand a chance this election!
FOUR MORE YEARS! FOUR MORE YEARS! FOUR MORE YEARS!
GO DUBYA!!!
|
|
|
Post by avtinUS on Jan 8, 2004 19:10:23 GMT -5
WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT! THE ECONOMY SUCKS! THERE ARE SO MANY PEOPLE OUT OF WORK!
BUSH JUST PASSED LAW ALLOWING 12 MILLION MORE FOREIGN WORKERS INTO US, DISPLACING US WORKERS!
GET THIS GUY OUT OF OFFICE! IT IS GETTING WORSE.
|
|
|
Post by annie45 on Jan 27, 2004 23:38:03 GMT -5
Kerry in 2004!!!! GO GO GO!!!
No more Bush yahoo!!!
|
|
|
Post by Republican on Feb 5, 2004 11:19:40 GMT -5
BUSH IS THE BEST FOR THE US. SADDAM IS GONE AND TERRORISM HAS JUST ABOUT ENDED.
DEMOCRATS GET A LIFE
|
|
|
Post by Monty on Feb 11, 2004 19:01:09 GMT -5
The economy is getting better. Bush has done an excellent job bringing the economy back from Clinton's failures, and the most destructive attack on our nation in 60 years.
|
|
|
Post by avtinUS on Feb 18, 2004 22:19:36 GMT -5
READ TODAYS NEWS ABOUT BUSH AND HE IS ALREADY BACK-PEDDLING ON NEW JOBS. GET HIM OUT OF OFFICE NOW! WE NEED OUR JOBS BACK!!!!
HERE IS A CUT FROM THE NEWS... THIS IS SO EMBARRASSING FOR REPUBLICANS...LIARS!!!!: WASHINGTON (Feb. 18) - President Bush distanced himself Wednesday from White House predictions that the economy will add 2.6 million jobs this year, the second embarrassing economic retreat in a week and new fuel for Democratic criticism.
|
|
|
Post by avtinUS on Mar 10, 2004 2:45:59 GMT -5
Bush is trying to find Osama Bin Laden now. This is his only hope for getting re-elected.
What about jobs??? There are plenty in India and Mexico. That's where all of ours went.
Go Kerry!!!!
|
|
|
Post by engelhard on Mar 20, 2004 14:31:27 GMT -5
Right... Let's hope Bush finds Ben laden and gets reelected, this is the only chance for occident's survival. Bush believes in what he fights for... Kerry is a muppet!!!
|
|
|
Post by annie45 on Mar 22, 2004 19:35:48 GMT -5
Did you see 60 minutes last night? The interview with Clarke about how Bush ignored the 9/11 warnings and has done a terrible job on the terrorism war.
Wow I am amazed at what Clarke had to say! I'm going to buy the book and read a lot more!
Read the following article:
Obsessed with Iraq, Bush ‘ignored’ terror threat
The Times, London WASHINGTON, March 22. — Mr George W Bush has been accused by a former White House official of ignoring the terrorist threat to USA before the 9/11 attacks, and of being over-eager to attack Iraq after them. Mr Richard Clarke, who served as the US President’s counter-terrorism co-ordinator and previously worked for the Clinton administration, said Mr Bush was vastly over-selling his achievements. Mr Bush had done “a terrible job on the war against terrorism”, according to Mr Clarke, who is publishing a book on the subject this week. “Frankly, I find it outrageous that the President is running for re-election on the grounds that he’s done such great things about terrorism. He ignored terrorism for months when maybe we could have done something.” Mr Clarke said he had written to Ms Condoleezza Rice, Mr Bush’s National Security Adviser, on 24 January 2001 seeking an urgent Cabinet-level meeting “to deal with the impending Al-Qaida attack”. A meeting did take place in April, yet the discussion was dominated by Iraq. After 9/11, Mr Clarke said, the Bush administration’s instinct was to target Iraq. Mr Bush asked him to find out if Iraq was involved. “He never said, ‘Make it up,’” said Mr Clarke of Mr Bush. “But the entire conversation left me in absolutely no doubt that Mr Bush wanted me to come back with a report that said, ‘Iraq did this.’ He came back at me and said, “Iraq! Saddam! Find out if there’s a connection,’ and in a very intimidating way.” Mr Donald Rumsfeld, Defence Secretary, went further, suggesting that the USA retaliate against Iraq. Mr Clarke said: “Mr Rumsfeld was saying we needed to bomb Iraq. We all said, ‘But no, Al-Qaida is in Afghanistan.’ And he said: “There aren’t any good targets in Afghanistan, but there are lots of good targets in Iraq.” Mr Paul O’Neill, whom Mr Bush dismissed as Treasury Secretary, has said that from the outset the White House was focused on Saddam Hussein.
‘Tone down’ WASHINGTON, March 22. — Mr Bush and his Democratic rival, Mr John Kerry, have been warned to tone down their presidential polls attacks or risk a vote boycott by alienated Americans. With a new poll showing Mr Bush and Mr Kerry neck-and-neck in the race, senior members of the Republican and Democratic parties appealed to the rivals to change their tactics. “Let’s keep it civil so we don’t get so nasty that we discourage people from voting in a very important election,” a Democratic Senator said. — AFP
|
|